Maybe so, but even emptiness needs a bridge over it

I respect your opinion, but it seems we simply have different perspectives on this topic, and no need to speak for others. You've shared your view, and I've shared mine so there's no need to argue further. Let's agree to disagree and move on.

It's ok if you don't like the project and anything beyond Bitcoin.

Tools that start as bridges often evolve into standalone ecosystems. We are just building the exit ramp first so users can move freely when they are ready.

Whether we like it or not, the world of cryptocurrencies extends far beyond Bitcoin. Ignoring this reality won't change anything. At the core of crypto lies freedom of choice, no one should dictate which asset is right or wrong. Everyone has the right to decide what holds value for them.

Our goal is to give people that freedom, to exchange any supported asset without risks of freezing, hidden fees, or censorship.

This is your opinion and we get it but ignoring the rest of the ecosystem won't make it disappear. We would rather build tools that keep swaps private and trustless, instead of leaving them to centralized exchanges.

We knew that new projects should gain trust first before going live, thats why we started from Bitcointalk and now moved to Stacker. We also knew that some people won't like it but we were sure that some would like the project.

Moreover, we aren't asking anything from users, only their time to test, which will be rewarded. All rewards are covered from our own pocket. As mentioned earlier, all testing is done exclusively on testnet networks, so no real funds are required or involved from the users' side.

That's a fair point! LN bridges the payment gap, but P2P exchanges bridge ecosystems. Without them, cross-chain liquidity and privacy-first swaps remain centralized. That's what we are working to fix. We really appreciate that you took the time to explore our project and share your perspective. This kind of discussion is what truly drives progress in the crypto space.

Fair point, but innovation often starts where others see <<shit>> We are experimenting, learning, and building something that might actually fix what smells bad in crypto.