My topic has a more dramatic title, it should sell more copies :)
#1545033

Thanks for taking my suggestion, Jack Dorsey: #1443511

Suitcoiner detected. Downzap inbound. Target destroyed.

So why don't those individual miners construct blocks with lower fees?

Yeah. This policy doesn't even match their "anti spam" narrative, it's just pure spite.

Fuck, you got me.

Phoenix for Lightning, Noah for Ark. Neither have great privacy though.

You must appease the anonymous whalemod to reach the front page :)

K, I downzapped this filth. Cmon.

Wild prediction: Antoine Poinsot gets the BIP54 consensus cleanup merged, then somehow betrays Bitcoin in the future.

Yeah, they are taking marketing advantage of the situation. I was already spending all day every day searching for bugs in Wasabi, the COLDCARD vulnerability didn't change anything about this.

Everyone starts to recognize the game theory once someone else starts playing with real money.

It's worth noting that the Red Team scanned BTCPay Server and completely missed the macaroon exploit: https://x.com/NicolasDorier/status/2085779382174372073

Wasn't me.

People don't share this idea because the idea of enforcing it makes them uncomfortable.

I think its actually very relevant. "CTV vaults save you when your cold card fails you".

It would be relevant if I made the claim that CTV would have stopped the COLDCARD attacker, but I didn't.

However, I will steelman that argument for you to fight it: The option of covenant enabled vaults could have mitigated some of the losses from the CC vulnerability. This is not because CTV protects coins directly, it is because users are more likely to use multisig/passphrase/dice rolls on their "final stand" vault wallet than they would for a daily spending wallet.

Surprised me too, I wonder why they are on the low health list.

I love being an asshole, no problem.

Hey, recreate a vault that protects an mk3 generated seed using presigned transactions. See how well it goes for you.

Irrelevant. Bitcoin is built on the assumption that users generate random secrets. Nothing matters if you discard this premise.

Saying some things are "kinda like" other things is not an argument against covenants. Try again.