pull down to refresh
800 sats \ 0 replies \ @Misha_Dany 5 Dec 2023 \ on: Find Your Co-Founder/Building Partner on Stacker News! ⚡ bitcoin
Name/Nym:
Misha
Summary of What You’re Building:
Global Remittances app, powered by LN, with fiat on & offramps
What Kind of Help Are You Looking For?
Round 1: Venture capital, advisors
Round 2: Legal, design
Round 3: Marketing, more fullstack engineers
Purpose:
Build a Bitcoin business - tap into the existing fin networks & create real value + boost adoption
How to Contact You:
On Telegram MishaD5
yeah, but that's not how human psychology works.
The ay it works right now is the same for all communication, TV, News, Radio, newspapers, public speakers
0%
Why on Earth would anyone take LESS?
Unless you're scheming there, but then you would take a lot of RISK, and you need risk premium.
never!
But what if your SM followers ask you to out your money where your mouth is - if you feel so strong or confident about a particular point or an outcome of an event.
And if it does not materialize as you had felt it would - you'd automatically lose the funds. Else, you keep the money, get credibility, and your ego gets to live another day lol!
skeptical. Need more research.
This feels like very "trad" finance.
Also,
- "undisclosed amount of equity" - kinda expected, but I think it'll be steep.
- on-site: no thank you, not exciting.
Should we really be excited?
Love the idea.
Also, "monetizing software is a bit taboo". Seriously, wth!
Except the miners, which is at the core of why the bitcoin network works in the first place, lol!
We can make a case that NOT monetizing is anti-Bitcoin.
Anyhow
We should ALWAYS monetize, and it does not have to be seen as bad or done is some shitty way.
- Release open source. Most people won't bother self-hosting anything.
- Offer hosting / service for a fee.
We won't reach any meaningful adoption without proper incentives.
" If we had a professional, working version of every product that was started on Bitcoin, but was abandoned due to the developers not getting anything out of it, Bitcoin would be decades ahead."
^ Now that's a great idea @timechain!
" e-mail spammers are actually doing us all a favor by essentially forcing us towards methods better than e-mail for communicating."
yeah, I hear you.
I'd love to move away from emails entirely. And mail for that matter.
But just like mail, it's still used for really important (usually government-related stuff like taxes, DMV, Medical / insurance companies).
Hence, gotta maintain a mailing address, that's not a P.O. Box. At least in the US.
Can't abondon it.
Maybe other countries have a better shot at moving to the better tech.
My biggest concern with Reacher is privacy - another layer, trust to a private company.
Also, ideally, I'd want to hold on to my original email address and just have a paywall-service layer sorting my emails.
That way If I needed to - I could still go and see
all emails sent to me in some folder that's tucked away.Anyhow, keeping my eyes out on a service that I can use.
Else, might have to build something, lol
Yeah I've been thinking about folder structure, where all
Sats emails sit in a folder similar Social or Promotions in gmail.- That way, these paid emails are not disctracting.
- You'll have an option to never see them, or scroll through in your free time.
This angle is more of a spam blocker.
Another feature is to do something like Vida platform or many of the OnlyFans like platforms. But for now I just wish the spam industry shrinks
GENESIS