NanoSon87

bitcoin

Conspiranoic Theory: Strategy is not buying the Bitcoin they claim to be buying.

I believe they are not doxing addresses anymore

Strategy's stratospheric Bitcoin purchases are all lies. It's just document filing, zero real Bitcoin bought.

Support this opinion with sats!

https://www.satswars.io/?article=18069

![](https://m.stacker.news/141136)

lightning

Try our new Nostr login!

bitcoin_beginners

Free speech is broken because it’s free

Great Lunanto! Let me know if the landing was smooth!

Would you pay sats to defend your opinion? (Lightning-based forum)

No worries bro, I allready thank you for your feedback. But you still wanna discuss...You literally say you are telling me the truth in my face and we are probably thousand km far away. You get it? You have zero cost on fighting. The idea, what we are testing, is how to build a protocol in which people must take responsability of their opinion. There are a lot of things we should improve. But for sure is not crap gambling it your sats are spend for suporting ideas.

Sure, everyone spend his sats in what considers worth.

Thanks for your feedback!

Okey, now I get it. You are one of those people who like picking fights for free on the internet. You are not built for arguing in satswars.

Thank you for your feedback. It's not gambling.

It works. Probably it's not working because it have some anti farming clauses, and you are not able just to create an account and withdraw the welcome bonus.

it's not gambling at all, it's suporting ideas, been rewarded when community stands with you and penalized if you try to manipulate truth or similar.

Yes, there are some similarities. To be honest, I wasn’t familiar with Stacker.News before, someone recommended I come here for feedback, so I really appreciate it.

I think one key difference is that in satswars you can create actual disputes backed by sats, where those who end up being wrong lose their sats, and the opinions that ultimately gain more support win them.

Thanks for your feedback!

* **A forum where you can pay sats to support or oppose opinions**
* **A Lightning-based forum where opinions have skin in the game**

Hey,

I’ve been thinking a lot about how online discussions work, and they mostly feel broken.

👉 [https://satswars.io](https://satswars.io)

Everyone has opinions, but there’s no cost to having them. You can say anything, change your mind instantly, argue endlessly, and nothing really happens. It’s all kind of weightless.

So I started experimenting with a simple idea: what if expressing an opinion wasn’t free?

I built a small thing called satswars. It’s basically a forum where people can post takes, and others can put sats behind them or against them. New users get 500 sats to try it, so you can just jump in and feel it.

What I’m curious about is whether adding even a tiny cost changes behavior. Do people think twice before posting? Do stronger opinions stand out more? Or does it just kill participation altogether?

There are obvious risks too. It might turn into a game. Maybe whales dominate. Maybe people coordinate and break the system. But then again, a lot of that already happens today, just without transparency.

The idea behind it is something like: **free speech is not for free**.

Not sure if this leads anywhere meaningful or if it’s a dumb experiment.

Would be great to hear what you think, especially from people who’ve spent time around Lightning and incentives.

⚡