I am laughing at you.

Read my article here called A Black Hole Node Can Trigger Hyperbitcoinization.

I suggest my article here: https://bitcoinawareness.substack.com/p/your-money-robs-you

Yes, good point. Ideally we have to begin with products that don't need these suppliers from outside. And each participant can start with a partial set of its inventory, one that it feels comfortable to price in the new reference. The community must have many diverse suppliers.

Not yet. We haven't placed anything there.

Bitcoin is the value meter of the world, let's act accordingly.

We submitted this article to AI Hal on Nostr and this is what it replied:
https://njump.to/nevent1qqstqfm0pf32cysdvm5k773xhfnd4knnspurlnmkuq8wf7xtkewcmcsppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsqa6p85dhghvx0cjpu7xrj0qgc939pd3v2ew36uttmz40qxu8f8wqrqsqqqqqphvpg3q

A circular economy in which a good that outside NOW costs 200 USD is sold by rougly 460 sats.

Thanks for your comment. What you are missing is that the idea is more radical. It describes the possibility of Bitcoiners creating a community where things are priced in sats while respecting the true value of Bitcoin, which is total world wealth divided by twenty one million. Yes, starting exactly like that.

Even online, if we start pricing things the way we explain here, everything naturally reorganizes because what is missing is a correct, non illusory and non manipulated measure of value instead of fiat. At first it may look chaotic or irrelevant in terms of price, but that happens only because we are still measuring through fiat.

The article where I describe this is here: https://bitcoinawareness.substack.com/p/suddenly-could-happen-now-if-unit

It will happen if we put unit of account first.

Fiat attacks would happen. I will address this in my next article about the subject.

Thanks for your comment. I will address points like these in my next article about the idea.

Thank you! I will read the guides with an eye to apply the idea mentioned in the article there.

Cool. Congrats.