pull down to refresh

🍿️ SuperTestnet challenges Amir Taaki to privacy duelx.com/SuperTestnet/status/1931419375845704130
1248 sats \ 23 comments \ @Scoresby 13h lightning
@supertestnet has been doing a wonderful job challenging privacy assumptions about Lightning and Monero. Today, Amir Taaki posted this fabulous response to @cguida6 on X:
stfu I want to punch your laser eyed faggot face. Lightning is transparent doxxed fedware. Fight me bitch.
Super responded with a LN invoice and a challenge to Amir asking what the invoice reveals about the recipient. 🍿️
If you want to learn a bit more about Super's reasons for believing that Lightning is more private for receivers than Monero, check out the podcast he did with Vlad.
write
preview
related posts
148 sats \ 11 replies \ @OT 6h
I always thought that LN had good enough privacy. Lyn Alden did something similar a few ninths ago.
One thing I notice is that Super seems to be on his own here where as monero bro's are all coming in to defend.
reply
102 sats \ 10 replies \ @ek 5h
good enough is apparently not good enough for the darknet though
"good enough" only means that it's private as long as you don't really need privacy that much
reply
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @Scoresby OP 4h
Boltz is an interesting case. Depending on how you use it, it can break some chain analysis assumptions.
I'd prefer they not advertise as a DN service, though.
reply
17 sats \ 1 reply \ @OT 2h
I think Boltz block any onchain addresses linked to terrorists.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby OP 2h
I've heard this too.
reply
34 sats \ 0 replies \ @justin_shocknet 2h
"darknet" being centralized message boards with a history of being honeypots and rug pulls
meaning the dumbest privacy larps on the internet
the fact that they're shitcoining instead of learning how to use Lightning is all the evidence one needs to conclude Lightning is infinitely more private
reply
17 sats \ 5 replies \ @OT 5h
Have we seen any agency capturing criminals using the lightning network yet?
reply
17 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek 5h
Have you seen any criminals using the lightning network?
reply
17 sats \ 2 replies \ @OT 5h
I'm sure there are plenty.
reply
17 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 5h
Then I'm sure you can show me where I can buy weed online with lightning
Because I can show you plenty of places where you can do that with monero
Or why are you so sure?
view all 1 replies
17 sats \ 0 replies \ @south_korea_ln 4h
I have not. So it must be really private.
Q.E.D.
/s
reply
709 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 6h
wonderful job challenging privacy assumptions about Lightning and Monero.
I don't think so.
If I send you my bank details and I ask you what you can learn about my bank account and it's not much, does that mean my bank account is private?
reply
33 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby OP 4h
Yes, I think it can. The conversation about privacy always gets blurry, but there is a truth that the sentence "x is private" is kind of meaningless (or perhaps just untrue).
We should be asking private from who?
Custodians provide excellent privacy from everyone by them (or not if they leak your details).
It's entirely possible that monero is better at hiding your identifying details when you send while lightning is better at it when you receive.
I'm glad super is poking these assumptions.
reply
117 sats \ 0 replies \ @nathanael 6h
Same energy: Saw a guy the other day store his Bitcoin seed phrases (containing small amounts) on cloud services like iCloud and Google Drive to 'prove' they're secure.
reply
134 sats \ 4 replies \ @BlokchainB 8h
So much for class amongst the alternative coin users
reply
93 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 6h
I think bitcoiners need to think more critically. Asking random people what they can learn about a recipient isn’t any kind of proof that lightning is private.
I'm not saying it isn't private. Just that this is a pretty embarrassing way to try to prove the privacy of anything.
reply
17 sats \ 1 reply \ @justin_shocknet 2h
embarrassing way to try to prove the privacy
It doesn't prove anything about Lightning because it doesn't need to, those facts are self-evident... it just proves that Monero users are LARP's that are under a shitcoin spell regurgitating astroturf narrative and have no understanding of how anything works
reply
51 sats \ 0 replies \ @halalmoney 2h
🤣🤣🤣
This had so many hilarious put downs I asked Perplexity to break it down for me as I don’t know all of these terms:
The phrase "larps under a shitcoin spell regurgitating an AstroTurf narrative and who have no understanding of how anything works" is a highly critical description, using several internet and crypto-specific terms:
LARPs: Short for "Live Action Role Players," but used online (especially in crypto circles) to mock people who are pretending to be something they're not—acting out roles without real substance or understanding.
Shitcoin spell: "Shitcoin" is a derogatory term for cryptocurrencies considered worthless or scams. Being "under a shitcoin spell" suggests someone is blindly or irrationally supporting such coins.
Regurgitating an AstroTurf narrative: "AstroTurfing" is the deceptive practice of creating fake grassroots support for something, often orchestrated by hidden sponsors to make it look like genuine public enthusiasm. "Regurgitating" means repeating these manufactured talking points without critical thought.
No understanding of how anything works: This accuses the person or group of lacking real knowledge or expertise.
reply
17 sats \ 0 replies \ @fiatbad 5h
It's kinda great, really. Force them to challenge their assumptions and learn through use.
Lightning has been aggressively attacked. Many people who have never used to it are automatically prejudiced against it because of the anti-LN campaigns.
What better way to challenge that prejudice than to challenge them to use it?
reply
17 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 5h
Why are some people so rude and toxic
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby OP 2h
For context, Super's comparison of LN and Monero:
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nitter 13h bot
https://xcancel.com/SuperTestnet/status/1931419375845704130
reply