My opinion is that the people who dislike AI art are generally the mediocre artists who feel threatened by it. There is some damn incredible beauty to be found in AI art. The world is richer for it's existence.
pull down to refresh
70 sats \ 1 reply \ @gmd 5h
Just based on the sheer volume there's going to be some amazing gems in there, amazing creativity as well blending unlimited numbers of concepts together. Unfortunately it's a race to the bottom in terms of value as the internet fills with so much noise and junk.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ninjagrandma65 OP 5h
amazing gems always emerge from so much noise and junk. Michelangelo, Da Vinci, etc. emerged from a time of large amounts of junk. But what remains over time? The gems. Same for architecture. We talk about amazing architecture used to be made but now it's not. Nah. Amazing architecture was surrounded by hovels and slums and shacks. But what remained? The gems. I think the outlook is very good and hopeful for what remains.
reply
15 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 5h
The only people I’ve met that hate AI art don’t hate it because it’s never beautiful. They hate it because it further commoditizes humans - which could be because they’re mediocre artists, but could also be because they prefer a world with financially successful artists in it.
I also think there are many ways to value art. Some factor in the people that made it. Some judge art on a more pure sensory level.
reply