pull down to refresh

most of us were late to bitcoin because we dismissed it as if were similar to things before. but for those that spent the time to see how different bitcoin is, they saw the reality sooner.
the only thing this has in common with Y2K is that it's a doom prediction about tech. numerical overflow and AGI/ASI being good or bad are otherwise totally distinct things.
i also think assuming that ai won't get intelligent very fast, despite it gaining whatever level of intelligence it has now rather quickly and progressively, requires some claim that contradicts the prevailing trend of them getting smarter and smarter. so what's in the way? what will prevent it?
is not gaining intelligence, nor smarter lol... it just gives the impression of being more productive as it gets trained with more and more data, providing more probabilistically accurate responses.
What's good or bad will change depending on what use you do with it... is not the tech itself. Is a mic good or bad, none. It just depends on who use the mic and which information will be broadcasting with it.
I might be just Sd00m myself
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 10h
so they'll never be intelligent or it's just so far away it's silly to be concerned about?
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @supratic 10h
it simulate intelligense. Nothing to be concern about if used appropriately.
All this it pure paranoia of the unknown. Noise.
reply