pull down to refresh
100 sats \ 9 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 23 Jun
Looks promising.
I would like even to have my own whirlpool to CoinJoin with only myself just to make it more difficult for normal people to follow the flow of money through my stack.
reply
115 sats \ 8 replies \ @DarthCoin 23 Jun
New ashigaru whirlpool coordinator can de-anonymize users
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5547639.0
using whirpool is useless nowadays. Idk why (clueless) people still use this crap today.
reply
0 sats \ 7 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 23 Jun
Thanks for sharing.
If this bug were patched, that would increase privacy and anonymity , yes?
reply
21 sats \ 6 replies \ @DarthCoin 23 Jun
again... whirpool is useless. Use LN.
reply
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 23 Jun
Why is it useless?
reply
21 sats \ 4 replies \ @DarthCoin 23 Jun
Because now we have LN and is much better.
Just think about this simple fact: through a single 1M sats channel I can coinjoin/ mix/ /whirlpool/whatever you want to call it... infinite amount of sats without any onchain trace.
If you do not realize how powerful is this, you still have a lot to learn about LN.
Coinjoin onchain is a matter of the past, from the pre-LN era...
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @m0wer 25 Jun
It hurt's to pay 0.1% + 0.5% in fee to Boltz when swapping “large” amounts though. Much cheaper with JoinMarket.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @anon 23 Jun
Is receiving privacy on Lightning still non-existent or has that been fixed somehow? I know you have good sending privacy on lightning but invoices reveal the receiving node to the sender and to all relaying nodes, right?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @m0wer 25 Jun
https://lnproxy.org/ and BOLT12 are your friends.
BTW the relaying nodes don't know the receiving node.
reply on another page
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 23 Jun
Yes, there is always so much more for me to learn.
How can you mix an infinite amount of sats through a 1 million Sat channel?
reply