pull down to refresh
0 new comment
100 sats \ 9 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 23 Jun
Looks promising.
I would like even to have my own whirlpool to CoinJoin with only myself just to make it more difficult for normal people to follow the flow of money through my stack.
reply
0 new comment
115 sats \ 8 replies \ @DarthCoin 23 Jun
New ashigaru whirlpool coordinator can de-anonymize users
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5547639.0
using whirpool is useless nowadays. Idk why (clueless) people still use this crap today.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 7 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 23 Jun
Thanks for sharing.
If this bug were patched, that would increase privacy and anonymity , yes?
reply
0 new comment
21 sats \ 6 replies \ @DarthCoin 23 Jun
again... whirpool is useless. Use LN.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 23 Jun
Why is it useless?
reply
0 new comment
21 sats \ 4 replies \ @DarthCoin 23 Jun
Because now we have LN and is much better.
Just think about this simple fact: through a single 1M sats channel I can coinjoin/ mix/ /whirlpool/whatever you want to call it... infinite amount of sats without any onchain trace.
If you do not realize how powerful is this, you still have a lot to learn about LN.
Coinjoin onchain is a matter of the past, from the pre-LN era...
view all 4 replies