What is definitely NOT a sign of intelligence but people think it is? \ stacker news ~AskSN

pull down to refresh

What is definitely NOT a sign of intelligence but people think it is?

642 sats \ 26 comments \ @Coinsreporter 15h AskSN

My belief is that intelligence is a set of multiple capabilities and merely having one can never be a sign of intelligence.

Still people often mark intelligence based on a single attribute. Seeing them do this, I become convinced that they don't know anything about intelligence and are themselves stupid in believing so.

view all related items

232 sats \ 4 replies \ @denlillaapan 12h

Credentialism, for sure.

I have a degree, I went to university, I am this or that professional. Yeah, but you're also an idiot.

Thankfully, I went to Oxford so I can usually trump/safely diminish whatever credentials they may bring up.

43 sats \ 1 reply \ @gmd 5h

Depends on the credentials. PhD in math/physics/engineering vs basket weaving. There are some very smart people in liberal arts but the credential itself is not predictive.

It's not popular opinion these days but elite universities do get a lot of talent. I work with young doctors from both Stanford and a community training program and the difference in the average intelligence/competence, especially early on in training is quite stark, even between Stanford and where I trained (UC). Saw a similar large gap when I was in the midwest between SLU and WashU students.

54 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 5h

You are correct that elite universities still attract a lot of talent. But we are talking small bubbles. Even medical students are a small minority at elite institutions.

I noticed a similar trend between Yale and UCLA students.

What I noticed immediately was that UCLA administrators were blatantly more political and diversity mandates were more stark and rigid

43 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 9h

Among the phd professors I know, none of them go by "Dr."

What I've found is that it's usually those of lesser degrees who insist on being called "Dr.", for whatever reason.

I think it's because the ones who actually know their stuff don't feel the need to rely on credentials. They're comfortable that they can establish everything they believe from the arguments. Thus, touting your credentials is a sign that you don't trust in your ability to establish your own aguments.

30 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 8h

TOTALLY!

“Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't.”

https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/57583-being-powerful-is-like-being-a-lady-if-you-have

210 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner 15h

dressed up in a suit and tie

1 sat \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter OP 14h

81 sats \ 2 replies \ @cryotosensei 12h

Good exam results

People don’t understand that young minds can be hothoused

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @gmd 5h

Yeah standardized tests suck except that they are better indicators than every other subjective measurement tool.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 11h

What do you mean by hothoused?

60 sats \ 3 replies \ @guerratotal 12h

One thing that is definitely NOT a sign of intelligence is complicated speech. Many people think that using fancy words makes you look smarter.

Also, winning an argument doesn't always show intelligence. Sometimes it just means the person was more aggressive or stubborn, or used better rhetoric.

15 sats \ 2 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 11h

I’ve lost many arguments because I simply don’t care enough to fight any longer, even though that doesn’t mean I was actually convinced I was wrong

50 sats \ 1 reply \ @guerratotal 11h

100% true. I think it's happened to all of us at some point.

When I was in college, a professor taught us this phrase, and I've never forgotten it:

Never argue with an ignorant person. They'll bring you down to their level, and then they'll beat you with experience.

Mark Twain

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 26m

I am undefeated on Reddit!

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @StillStackinAfterAllTheseYears 6h

Memorization skills.

95 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 12h

I'd say everything is not a sign, because you cannot generalize intelligence and probably not truly measure it either. But I think that this doesn't even matter because:

Past performance offers no guarantees for future returns.

If you get a stroke (or long covid) and you can't finish that IQ test that you previously scored 150 on, are you now less intelligent? Even simpler: are you likely to be measured as intelligent as before while you're going through a nasty divorce or mourning the loss of a relative?

This is why, from where I'm sitting, while of course having developed cognitive skills like problem solving ability make a huge difference, attitude is much more important in life, and often a much more critical success factor than (perceived) intelligence.

37 sats \ 3 replies \ @BlokchainB 15h

Being a good Speller

222 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter OP 14h

207 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 15h

Defanately rite.

17 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 11h

Hahah

50 sats \ 0 replies \ @klk 13h

Language/accent. Native speakers will always sound better no matter how dumb they are.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nichro 7h

Using the semicolon + Being a grammar nazi online esp. in comment sections

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @fiatbad 10h

Belief in the existence of a "higher power".

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @flat24 10h

I think that an intelligent person is that with the ability to matter ... and not simply someone who follows orders, patterns or customs without basis or foundations, rather than that they are like that, because they "say it"

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @OneOneSeven 10h

Just owning bitcoin.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @d680ecaa8e 14h

Some people follow a tutorial on youtube and think it is sign of intelligence while it is not, if you don't invent something new or your proper manner or your own perspective and do it by letter it would not be a sign of intelligence.