If you care about maintaining public safety and ensuring the survival of civilization, then you don't have the luxury of not judging groups collectively. It's a classic case of market failure, where liberty of a minority must be suspended for the collective good. 

> Not really, because bitcoiners for example, are adherents of the non aggression principle, which Muslims, collectively, are not

As a NAP person, I don't commit aggression against, nor do I believe we should deport, individuals based on interpretations of what a heterogenous collective *is* "collectively" even when cribbed as "historical fact."

k00b

Not really, because bitcoiners for example, are adherents of the non aggression principle, which Muslims, 

, are not. They bring violence with them wherever they go, particularly to advance their political agenda. This is historical fact.

Politics_And_Law

deleted by author

sirstackalot

Not really, because bitcoiners for example, are adherents of the non aggression principle, which Muslims, *collectively*, are not. They bring violence with them wherever they go, particularly to advance their political agenda. This is historical fact.