Same here.

Not sure about how it'll work out.

I know of errors in nearly all the papers that I have studied in detail. I could make a lot of money there, just reporting all those minor errors~~ Math errors, convergence issues, etc. No bad intentions by the authors, just part of the game.

They are mostly all good papers that would not deserve public shaming. The papers advanced the field despite those small errors.

It'd be good though if this system just pushes people to publish errata, but even then, it'd be without end in my field. There are just too many minor errors..

For major errors, Retraction Watch does a pretty good job as far as I know.

Agree with that. What's the business model? Who will pay once the grant runs out?