11235 sats! \ stacker news ~the_stacker

pull down to refresh

2218 sats \ 18 comments \ @Jimmyhoneyalchemist 28 Jul the_stacker_muse

That was the price for posting #1055867 this story. I got overzealous in my posting and wanted to share that I may have lost some sats in the process but that’s fine because it’s a lesson learned. So from now on I will stick to writing here and having linking photos on my instagram otherwise I will be satsless. Anyone is welcome to follow me but I only follow people I know and places I go.

https://www.instagram.com/jimmy_honey_alchemist?igsh=eHdsdXVtNnRwcXp6&utm_source=qr

I haven’t posted anything there yet but I will be soon. Thanks for reading. May everyone have a great day.

view all related items

31 sats \ 9 replies \ @grayruby 28 Jul

Why did it cost 11235 sats to post? The posting fee is only 135 sats.

40 sats \ 6 replies \ @Coinsreporter 28 Jul

I guess the size of the photos. I've read that SN charges after a limit.

20 sats \ 5 replies \ @grayruby 28 Jul

Didn't know that.

132 sats \ 4 replies \ @Coinsreporter 28 Jul

Found it in the faqs..

40 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 28 Jul

yep, they must've been raw images. maybe we can do something to fix that before they get uploaded

40 sats \ 1 reply \ @Jimmyhoneyalchemist OP 28 Jul

How would someone fix that? I’m sorry I’m not very tech savvy

40 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 28 Jul

we'd just shrink the images to a size for viewing rather than one for editing

20 sats \ 0 replies \ @LibertasBR 28 Jul

In that case, it would be better if he just linked the photo hosted elsewhere, right?

20 sats \ 1 reply \ @Jimmyhoneyalchemist OP 28 Jul

Each photo cost 100 I believe.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 28 Jul

I have never posted that many photos at once but I have never heard of it costing more to post more photos.

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @LibertasBR 28 Jul

JPEG fix this.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Jimmyhoneyalchemist OP 28 Jul

Thanks but I’m going to use instagram as a part of my orange pilling strategy.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @LibertasBR 28 Jul

Instagram isn’t orange pilling. It’s more like this:

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Jimmyhoneyalchemist OP 28 Jul

Sometimes you have to use the enemies own tools to your advantage.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @billytheked 28 Jul

Hi Jimmy,

i noticed the territory revenue was higher than usual on this day, and i suppose this would explain it.

my goal is not so much to profit from this territory as to try and build a community for creatives. i usually do my best to pay forward the revenues to the people posting here. it is your territory as much as is mine.

i sent 7864¹ sats directly to your wallet because i enjoyed your post and i dont think you should have to pay for your mistake.

cheers friend

the amount you paid minus the irredeemable 30% sybil fee. ↩

11 sats \ 0 replies \ @Jimmyhoneyalchemist OP 28 Jul

Bless you. Thank-you so much.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @4dcfa2e179 28 Jul

Why so much exhubitant SATS for posting? It's really surprising.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BitcoinIsTheFuture 28 Jul

The old Rigg-a-Toni

Footnotes