pull down to refresh
I've heard that interpretation. As for precedent, I'm not sure how durable subtleties like that are legally.
reply
pull down to refresh
I've heard that interpretation. As for precedent, I'm not sure how durable subtleties like that are legally.
I wonder if the "knowing transmission of illegal proceeds" is basically due to the explicit shitposting to that effect on Twitter?
Had they just kept their fucking mouths shut, does this plea happen?