pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @anon 1 Aug \ on: How Good Are The Widely Used Coinjoin Implementations? - Peter Todd privacy
I don't find his explanation of why Join Market doesn't work very easy to understand. I have heard a lot of this rhetoric before, but if JoinMarket "doesn't work" why do people continue using it/working on it.
write
preview
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @96c0b276a3 1 Aug
Yeah me neither. Seems like what he describes impacts all 3 main implementations to an extent.
reply
213 sats \ 2 replies \ @petertodd 1 Aug
It doesn't. Wasabi is not vulnerable to that issue at all as every participant participates equally. Nor is payjoin, as it's a payment, combining (some) funds for the two parties.
I'd suggest that you sit down with a pen and paper and try working out what input paid the fees yourself. That's the best way to understand the issue.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @OT 1 Aug
Knowing who paid the fee in the first round doesn't give away who pays in the next round.
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @petertodd 1 Aug
In Wasabi every participant pays part of the fees. Also, there may only be one coinjoin transaction: depending on your privacy needs, a single transaction can be sufficient.
reply