pull down to refresh
100 sats \ 7 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 7 Aug \ parent \ on: After using ChatGPT, man swaps his salt for sodium bromide—and suffers psychosis lol
Show me where it says that. Ahahah
Your content. You may provide input to the Services (“Input”), and receive output from the Services based on the Input (“Output”). Input and Output are collectively “Content.” You are responsible for Content, including ensuring that it does not violate any applicable law or these Terms. You represent and warrant that you have all rights, licenses, and permissions needed to provide Input to our Services.
- Input and Output are collectively Content
- You are responsible for Content
reply
bastards
reply
reply
Whoa. Couldn't they entrap people by feeding them illegal output?
WHOA. The federal government is partnering with OpenAI.
F***
reply
Probably, but
- They won't need to entrap people because it fucks you up proper without intervention, per OP.
- Is it entrapment if you agreed to the ToS this is spelled out in? I'm not a lawyer so idk what I'm talking about but it looks dodgy from where I'm sitting due to that definition.
reply
My paranoid scenario is that the CIA/FBI instructs OpenAI to send illegal output to a targeted user, they then use that illegal output as a pretext to further investigate and prosecute the target. The user would have no way of knowing that the output generated was customized to target them, and the TOS says they are responsibility for the legality of the outputs.