reply on: Locked 1 BTC until 2030 \ stacker news ~bitcoin

pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 9 replies \ @piggy 19h \ parent \ on: Locked 1 BTC until 2030 bitcoin

Censorship occurs when a platform, moderator, or official uses their control over visibility or access to silence dissenting opinions rather than debate them. If there’s a valid reason for the censorship, please share it below this post. Otherwise, it doesn’t look good.

21 sats \ 2 replies \ @billytheked 19h

screw off scammer yer being called out by erryone -- no moderators ere sides the good ppl of sn

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @piggy 19h

Ahaha, SN tried to push their broken vision of self-custody for non-technical grandmas. When it became unsustainable, and after some quotes from another stacker about Hal’s vision of Bitcoin banks plus a link to BT... the post was outlawed. Censorship at its finest! We will taking this elsewhere to discuss.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @billytheked 19h

Aaaaaahhaha

i know yore sent by Garrett n is goonies--no fooling BONNEY

5 sats \ 5 replies \ @k00b 19h

11 stackers collectively spent 30,866 sats downzapping this which made it cross the outlaw threshold. No secret platform control made this outlawed.

For those of us in wild west mode, as I am, it's still the top boost.

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @piggy 19h

And OP spent 150,000 sats to boost it!

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b 19h

Because boost is unilateral, it does not affect outlaw status. We want stackers to be able to control ads.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @piggy 19h

Thanks for the explanation. This makes Boost unusable, if it costs 30k sats to outlaw anything, and lets a few stackers censor opposing views, so other opinions never get through.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 19h

To be fair, this post achieved 10x more visibility than pretty much any other recent post. So if the purpose was to get eyeballs on the product, mission accomplished

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @piggy 19h

For me, yes, for OP - IDK. Let’s get SN back to its usual state, with less anger at least.