pull down to refresh
Interesting read. Thanks for sharing.
In my scenario, node 3 would not be fully anon as I'd like it to be end-of-chain, as a receiving node. While I imagine yours only has private channels towards your public node, so no outside peer routes through your public node to your private node. Or did I misunderstand something?
I like the idea of a fully anon node though. Maybe that will then become my node #4, provided I first get the Blixt one ;)
The 2nd node (anon) is just a regular node, with public and private channels. I name it "anon" because I do not link its nodeID with any of my online nyms or identities.
So, you have a public face, and a private face (that nobody knows who is or do).
Blixt, being a mobile node and with specific features, have another role, more as a anonymous spending gate.
Got it, thanks
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author
Nice write up!
Is more or less what I tried to explain in this article with a scenario of 3 nodes:
https://darthcoin.substack.com/p/node-liquidity-guide