pull down to refresh

252 sats \ 8 replies \ @k00b 15h \ on: Stacker Saloon
Pretty slick. I might not ship it from the jump though given it's another thing to test.
write
preview
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @sox 13h
YES readable overview, that's really cool
reply
100 sats \ 6 replies \ @k00b 11h
multiple sources in
reply
50 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 10h
What's the difference between sats and lightning
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 10h
Sats are reward sats. Lightning is some noncustodial source of sats
reply
202 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b 9h
multiple sources in with a non-custodial out (zap with CCs and reward sats paying part of the sybil fee)
the coolest thing about these aren't the charts. it's that the data backing the chart isn't deduced after the fact. it's displaying the data that's been recorded exactly as it has been recorded (the visualization has even unintentionally helped me catch bugs). (and the data model is extensible, ie can easily allow for more splitting.)
reply
100 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 8h
with forwards
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 8h
how will forwards work with mixed CCs/sats
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 8h
When this ships, for receivers they'll work as they do now (ie CCs only). In some later release, each forward will be an independent, fractional zap (ie potentially non-custodial).
reply