Looked into it awhile ago and recall not being very compelled, that said I also don't recall any individual items raising red flags... ill have to review again if it makes another push.

It's been around for many years which undermines any urgency claims.

Also bundling and the naming has "Inflation reduction act" vibes. Anything at the consensus layer, if truly pressing, wouldn't need marketing spin.

Bandwagon know-nothings like Steve Lee and technical counter-signals like Corallo (collectively Spiral) having affinity with it is further grounds for not doing it as described. Nothing good can come from lending them credibility, even throwing Corallo a like when we do incidentally align on something feels dirty and like I need to strawman myself.

If we set a precedent that bundling and marketing consensus changes works that's far more dangerous than inaction. Changes to Bitcoin must meet a standard of criticality and overwhelming consensus.