pull down to refresh

Having recently synced a fullnode from scratch, using old hardware, IBD took an entire month, whereas same hardware 3 years ago IBD took 3 days.
IMO, UTXO bloat is the main technical issue facing Bitcoin right now, so to the extent that larger OP_RETURN sizes will actually cause the shitcoiners to move their data there instead of in witness script, that seems like a positive development.
102 sats \ 1 reply \ @Artilektt 3h
Right but in the thread don't they touch on the fact that not many are likely to move to OP_RETURN because it will still be cheaper to do it the other way.
reply
Right, that's why I qualified my statement with "to the extent that"
I hope the spamming is just a fad and all the spammers lose all their money. No one needs jpegs on the blockchain and there are better technologies for that.
reply