pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @SimpleStacker 22h \ on: Bitcoin is about money, spam has no place in the timechain bitcoin
So, I think what he's saying is that miners should be the ones to filter spam, not the protocol developers. He said that miners could be nudged to do that through education/persuasion, or through user behavior, which I didn't fully understand.
write
preview
40 sats \ 2 replies \ @Lumor 19h
His idea is that users who make transactions start adding an extra output that goes to a 1 of N multisig that is addressed to spam-filtering miners. We bribe pools to filter spam in order for them to collect extra fees from such transactions instead of spam-transactions.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 19h
I think the part I didn't understand is: I didn't know that you can address transactions to specific miners or types of miners
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Lumor 19h
Yeah, I guess each miner/pool who wants these extra fees will have to disclose a public key. Then it's up to users to keep track of who is ellegible to be part of the multisig due to anti-spam compliance.
reply