pull down to refresh
120 sats \ 4 replies \ @79c9095526 4h \ on: Debunking the Slander on Charlie Kirk: what he *Actually* said on Gun Deaths Politics_And_Law
"The fact Charlie was murdered by someone solely because that someone didn't like what he said should be enough of a reason to trigger outrage on anyone in the US, regardless of their personal political views."
How do you know this is a fact? Is this a fact because Trump/govt told you it is (prior to even pointing to a killer)?
For a group of don't trust, verify bitcoiners, there are an awful lot of people who believe the company line quite quickly without konwing a SINGLE fact except that Charlie was murdered.
Part of being a bitcoiner is the ability of making checksums, with you clearly lack of.
You will not believe the obvious even after it becomes official, for then you will claim the official is also false. You don't want the truth, you simply want to stick to your narrative.
reply
This is a post from a personal longtime friend of Charlie Kirk:
reply
Tbh, @79c9095526 does have a point. We do not know the motivation yet afaik.
You don't want the truth, you simply want to stick to your narrative.
Which narrative? Afaict, they did not reveal anything about which narrative they believe, they just mentioned that your narrative has holes
reply
Reread your first sentence, it doesn't make sense. Perhaps you just mistyped a word or two?
You're right, its hard to believe "official narratives" after the FBI yesterday leaked that the shooter has a trans ideology based on writings on the bullets. Now what was their 'proof' of this? The following images. When the decision was clearly made ahead of time to blame this on a particular group to fit the narrative the people in power prefer, you have to take all of this with a fuck-ton of salt.
reply