pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @didiplaywell OP 4h \ parent \ on: Debunking the Slander on Charlie Kirk: what he *Actually* said on Gun Deaths Politics_And_Law
Part of being a bitcoiner is the ability of making checksums, with you clearly lack of.
You will not believe the obvious even after it becomes official, for then you will claim the official is also false. You don't want the truth, you simply want to stick to your narrative.
This is a post from a personal longtime friend of Charlie Kirk:
reply
Tbh, @79c9095526 does have a point. We do not know the motivation yet.
You don't want the truth, you simply want to stick to your narrative.
Which narrative? Afaict, they did not reveal anything about which narrative they believe, they just mentioned that your narrative has holes
reply
Reread your first sentence, it doesn't make sense. Perhaps you just mistyped a word or two?
You're right, its hard to believe "official narratives" after the FBI yesterday leaked that the shooter has a trans ideology based on writings on the bullets. Now what was their 'proof' of this? The following images. When the decision was clearly made ahead of time to blame this on a particular group to fit the narrative the people in power prefer, you have to take all of this with a fuck-ton of salt.
reply