pull down to refresh

100 sats \ 5 replies \ @LibreHans 6h \ parent \ on: Peter Wuille post about dropping OP_RETURN limit bitcoin
The same way I've estimated fees since before the feature existed. And it doesn't matter if it's optimal or not anyway since we got RBF.
"You have to relay spam to have a computer give you economic advice for fees you can replace anyway" - really makes no sense.
write
preview
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @optimism 5h
The same way I've estimated fees since before the feature existed
"the feature" being estimatesmartfee?
How do you estimate then?
PS: you don't have to relay. Just have to have knowledge about it.
reply
100 sats \ 3 replies \ @LibreHans 5h
It seems like you're missing the point. How I personally estimate fees is irrelevant, the point is that it's not a computer science problem and that a computer can't solve it, and that it doesn't matter because of RBF anyway.
reply
102 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 5h
Oh, well, I'm sorry to be a noob. Apologies for asking questions.
reply
200 sats \ 1 reply \ @LibreHans 5h
There's no need to be snarky, I was trying to get us on the same level, but you don't have to if you don't want to.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 5h
So was I, hence the questions? After all, if you would share your methods, maybe I will learn something about fee estimation.
reply