pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @LibreHans 5h \ parent \ on: Peter Wuille post about dropping OP_RETURN limit bitcoin
Right now, spam isn't meaningfully increasing the utxo set at all - in fact blocks are often not full.
If you only consider size and ignore how much compute it takes to sync the chain after all the recent spam, we can't really have a meaningful conversation.
In my opinion, if you're concerned for the poorest of the world, forget their ability to afford a node, and focus on their ability to own a utxo. That's where I'd say the real rub is.
Thanks for admitting that you don't care about node decentralization.
It's convinced you and many others
Social media didn't convince me of anything, the communication and actions of core devs did.
write
preview
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @leaf 5h
Thanks for admitting that you don't care about node decentralization.
As I said, utreexo or something else will solve this issue. Node cost isn't an issue.
reply