pull down to refresh
18 sats \ 7 replies \ @justin_shocknet 3h \ on: Anyone else going down the rabbit hole on the Charlie Kirk Assassination? news
There's no question there's a conspiracy, the only question is which. Fog of war.
NatSec people that aren't "official" to maintain deniability, but documentedly close to the admin like former NSA's (Flynn, Bannon) keep things on-script, are unambiguous in foreshadowing that there are other shoes to drop and make sure things aren't memory-holed.
I don't buy the credit card gun (though I'm sure the CIA has something similar, hell they killed Breitbart with a heart-attack gun and Kennedy's driver finished him with a pneumatic pistol) based purely on the caliber that must have been used to rock his body such as video showed and the wound. I also dismiss the baseball signals, those were debunked as being standard by those specific agents. The two combined make even less sense, down range signals would be spotting for a sniper.
There had to be some kind of security compromise though, how could there have been no eyes on the nearby roof? a sweep with a $30 drone prevents that... thats just another reason Butler stinks too especially given SS levels of security. (Butler was a "red carpet" performance imo, with a palmed razer blade to cut the ear... remember Trump's closeness to the WWE where that was a common trick for creating blood)
One thing that caught my ear last week was Tucker on Megyn Kelley talking about Kirk having made enemies over lobbying Trump wrt Israel... and now twitter is a shitstorm over Candace Owns (I think she's full of shit generally but was close to Charlie) implicating Israel via Bill Ackman... the split on Israel among people close to everything is definitely sus, but Israel narratives are so common at this point that they sound lazy.
All the foreshadowing hints at a larger domestic terror network coordinated and funded by NGO's... using RICO to take them down... no surprise there...
So even if it was a rando, that rando is a victim of psycological operations run by something bigger. Either way, it doesn't stop with one or even dozens of arrest.
Navarro on CNBC yesterday, listen carefully to his framing. It's a civil war between factions at the highest levels of power, all we see are pawns of a grander conspiracy.
Kirk on Tucker just a month ago, "all roads lead to the intelligence agencies"
Bannon, regularly, Nunes and Patel have barely any grip on their respective agencies with black box operatives and dark budgets embedded within each.
To what extent foreign powers and domestic deep-state or money'd interests align may never be fully known... now if only @Cje95 could get us something useful to chew on from a SCIF, Guantanamo, or the FISA courts instead of normie news we could begin to paint the bigger picture.
Do you have any more details about why you dismiss the baseball signals with the security guards? In what way are they normal?
reply
I don't catalog this stuff because it's a fool's errand, but this theory started floating last week and there were countless deboonkers posting videos of that specific security guard acting similarly at previous events. It's Charlie's regular head of security.
Not to say he can't be compromised just because he's a regular, and not to say the signals can't be switched up, but it's very flimsy and basic. It makes even less sense in the context of the shot coming from his 3'oclock as opposed to down range.
That would also be terrible opsec from a professional operator knowing how many eyes and cameras were on him.
On the cellphone gun, those are only useful to about 20' or so, looks out of range... no residue mist... and other angles of video seem conclusive it was from the front, bullet entered front of the kneck/upper chest above the collar and blew out his artery. I'd only consider that type of weapon a viable theory from someone in the front few rows.
reply
Do you know of any collection of videos somewhere? I'd really be interested in seeing them.
reply
X is a shitshow for finding things you've seen, if you search for Kirk security on there i'm sure you'll have a field day.
reply
Watching the video you linked above and i'm even more skeptical on that gun, the "shooter" doesn't even sight the "weapon", tantamount to a hip shot out of range.
Certainly possible he was a backup shooter, like Kennedy's driver was, but that's the best steelman for that case I can come up with
reply
To me it looks like there's significant recoil on the gun that he's holding, right when Charlie slumps. And then there's something right before that - maybe him assembling the gun, or a misfire or something.
And what about the guy in the white baseball cap, who's holding a device that looks like a cell phone, that seems to be pointed at Charlie's neck? Maybe that's somehow related to the shooting.
It's like with magicians - it's really hard to figure out how exactly "the magic" happens...but it does happen.
reply
Certainly anything is possible, but this is still very reach-y. I don't consider myself a firearms expert but I know my way around them and people that know more then me have not casted any doubt on it being a rifle caliber or taken from the front.
No doubt either that there is magic and trickery to these ops, but that's also why I don't care much about who pulled the trigger... that's just a pawn... the story is bigger than who was there that day.
As Bannon says, I want who killed him, not just who pulled the trigger.
Getting mired into what may or may not have happened on scene ignores the bigger questions of who set it up, why, and why now.
reply