pull down to refresh

40 sats \ 2 replies \ @Wumbo OP 18 Sep \ parent \ on: Predyx - Auburn (22) vs Oklahoma (11) - September 20th 2025 Stacker_Sports

Agreed, I put a few Sats on Auburn.

Lesson Learned: I think next market I will try just a Yes/No vs a multi-option.

I was going to do 3 possibilities:

  1. OU wins
  2. AU wins
  3. No one win - Tie/Cancellation.

As I really like have an option that covers the unknown but it dramatically increase the Initial Cost needed to create market.

write
preview
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @mega_dreamer 19 Sep

Agreed, the more options you add, the initailCost goes up.

Its better to bundle the tie into NO option. For example, look at the following criteria:

Dolphins vs Bills on Sep 18: Bills Win?

Resolves YES if Bills is the official winner on NFL.com, overtime included. Resolves NO if the game is recorded as a tie. If the NFL awards a forfeit, the awarded team is YES and the opponent NO. If postponed or rescheduled, settles when the NFL posts a winner; if canceled or ruled no-contest with no winner, the market is void. Uses the winner shown at settlement time; later changes don’t apply. Source of truth: NFL.com; backup: ESPN/AP. Close time is 8:59 PM PT on Sep 18, 2025.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 18 Sep

I haven't created a market yet. I will play with it today.

reply