pull down to refresh

Howdy there, partner! Welcome on into the Stacker Saloon.

Saddle on up to a stool and spill the beans about your day, fire away with them questions, or let loose and give us the lowdown on your wild and woolly life. We're all ears, so don't hold back!

We're open round the clock, so mosey on in whenever you please!

Enjoying with nature!!

reply

Join The Stacker Sports Poker Club
#1229138

reply


an epic battle

reply

we need a learnmealightning.com

reply

Yeah, I just read this

reply

Wish I could zap him.

reply

this reads like

"so what you learn to drive them things around, instead of a horse? And when you run outta fuel? and when that wheely thing breaks??"

reply

@aljaz is maintaining a nice list here:
https://lightning-network.tech

this one is really nice too but idk why wasn't posted more "lessons".
https://simplelightning.com

reply

I'll be honest. $NAKA looks kinda tempting. They own 5765 BTC which is approximately $663 million in market value, but their market cap is currently only $560 million (according to Schwab), so they are trading at a 0.85 mNav.

The risk is that if you buy a share of NAKA, you don't own any claim to the underlying assets. Equity holders are actually last in line to get paid back if the company goes bankrupt, shareholders could be left holding a turd.

reply

you should change your nym into FiatStacker

reply

I confess, I still have too much fascination with playing fiat games

reply

I guess you want to chip in for their salaries

reply

Can something get "outlawed" if I'm the only one downzapping it?

reply

That's a great question. I too would like to know the answer.

reply

Yes, you can, if you have enough global trust in that territory. We don't currently distinguish between territory and global outlaws, but I think about it occasionally (like everything I intend to eventually do).

reply

Got it, just that I had downzapped something to purple level and it still wasn't outlawed. I need more trust then lol

reply

Ooo now I'm curious what you downzapped

reply

Oh just the usual AI slop, on the satoshi post.

reply

ah, I know which one you're referring to

reply

Share your Outfit Opinions for today's topic on ~Goods_and_Gadgets.

reply
reply

Hey @sudonaka, I don't want to open a new thread, I only want to clarify some aspects of your last comment here: #1224839

  1. I do not play any "role" in this debate. As I said, I don't give a shit about any of node software you run or others run. I do not take sides, I think rational and practical.

This debate is not like "block size war" was in 2016-2017. This is totally different and is useless.

  1. I run for myself some LND nodes connected to various neutrino peers. So for me REALLY DOESN'T MATTER THIS DEBATE between knots and core.

I use onchain very rarely, so really doesn't bother me anymore the "size of the blockchain". I use sats mostly through LN channels and blocks served by neutrino peers. So I REALLY do not download any "spam" like you always try to push this idea.

So what are you going to do about this? Nothing. I do not run none of them, Core or Knots. Sue me for that.

I am tired of all this bullshit virtue signaling with people "announcing" what node they run. Is really pathetic and useless.

  1. If you don't like that, you are free to fork Bitcoin as you like. Let's see if you have balls to do that.

Bitcoin is based on incentives, on fees, so any tx that paid a fee is valid, we like it or not, this is the truth, no matter if it contains other data or not.

You don't like how Core team deal with this? Fine, fork Bitcoin and create your own filtered version, without incentives.

Really why knots supporters do not fork Bitcoin and get over with ? Nobody will stop you. PLEASE DO IT!Really why knots supporters do not fork Bitcoin and get over with ? Nobody will stop you. PLEASE DO IT!

I would love to double again my btc stash...

reply

Maybe you don’t have patience for this debate anymore, but your arrogance and comments about how “pointless” policy is shows what your “role” is.

Your role is to wake up average noderunners to realize they cannot trust OGs or devs anymore.

The noderunners must learn themselves what kind of policy they want to set, and that they are 100% responsible for the consensus they run.

You know this already, so you think it’s stupid- but many people are learning for the first time.

This is all part of the reason we now are moving to competing implementations of Bitcoin clients, which will help ensure the continued strengthening of the consensus rules above all.

reply

"fork your mother if you want to fork".... as the famous old quote said

reply

No one wants to fork. You think you will scare people?

reply
No one wants to fork.

pussies

reply

Totally.

reply

Off-thread thanks to @0xbitcoiner for being a chad and cc-ing gladstein on a question about HRF. Thx amigo.

reply

de nada!

I think it’s important to clear up your doubts. #1228572

Don’t trust, verify!

reply
reply

ChatGPT is struggling to format a basic word document

reply

try Claude, i've had better results from claude lately

reply

TIL that Claude is a red-pilled classical Western liberal:

reply

When I saw the related posts on @BlokchainB’s post, I realized SN turned 4 on June 11th. I went back to check the posts from that day and saw that no one posted about it. So, happy (belated) birthday, SN! 🤠

reply

"The axe forgets what the tree remembers"

reply

Happy Friday

reply

Day 631 of posting mining earnings from the day before: 218 sats on 18Sep2025!
Running total: 415,406 sats!

Yesterday's comment

Stickers for Stackers - Free Raffle GiveawayStickers for Stackers - Free Raffle Giveaway

  1. Like and repost this tweet or note on socials to invite others to join.
  2. Leave a comment with your preferred number and nym at #1225577

Spread the SN love and g'luck!

deleted by author