pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @ACYK 21 Sep \ on: Filter Out Hot Markets at Predyx for the Weekend oracle
For the Auburn Oklahoma game, how was there 5.09k sats paid out to winners, but only one loser of 39 sats? Still trying to figure out the user interface, but shouldn’t the amount won equal the amount lost (minus fees)?
write
preview
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Team_Predyx OP 21 Sep
That's where the initial liquidity comes into play + there may be some orders on 'No' but users sold them before the market close. In the end it was only one remaining user with 'No' shares.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ACYK 21 Sep
but users sold them before the market close
Who did these users sell the "No" shares to? Wouldn't whoever bought the "no" shares still have them, and be shown in the "losers" section? Or does it mean User X bought them, and User X also had "yes" shares, so they offset, and it reduced the number of "yes" shares user X was holding?
If so, would it be possible to show the amount of sats "lost" by users selling "no" shares at a loss (i.e. less than they bought them for). It feels like that is a missing piece of the closing metric.
reply