pull down to refresh

86 sats \ 5 replies \ @optimism 21 Sep \ on: Artificial Intelligence and law: What legal teams need to know Politics_And_Law
It's been interesting to see how some really lazy former colleagues of yours got caught and sanctioned. (I also touched on it in my weekly of July 7-13)
I've for a while tracked The Volokh Conspiracy (hosted by Reason) because they seemed to comment on the friction and follow it closely, i.e. the last post about it was 9 days ago.
I don't always have time to read all that though - it's very verbose.
write
preview
100 sats \ 4 replies \ @siggy47 OP 21 Sep
I used to read the Volokh Conspiracy in my former life. Maybe I'll check it out again.
reply
72 sats \ 3 replies \ @optimism 21 Sep
I only found it by accident: when you consume the entirety of reason's main rss feed, you get these too haha.
reply
100 sats \ 2 replies \ @siggy47 OP 21 Sep
You sent me down a rabbit hole! I was obsessed with that blog twenty something years ago. It has an interesting history:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Volokh_Conspiracy
reply
36 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 21 Sep
I often like to remind myself to take the perspective that some good things actually having a tendency to stick around, even against the odds. Gives a much less doomer outlook that way. Interesting that WaPo almost killed it with their dumbass paywalling 1 - I didn't know that.
What attracted you to it?

Footnotes

  1. Democracy dies in darkness behind a paywall ↩
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 OP 21 Sep
Oh, I was a bit of an activist libertarian lawyer, so this was right in my wheel house.
reply