reply on: Why people leave nostr (and SN?) \ stacker news ~nostr

pull down to refresh

147 sats \ 14 replies \ @Scoresby 27 Sep \ on: Why people leave nostr (and SN?) nostr

If njump is down for you, here's screenshots:

141 sats \ 0 replies \ @gmd 27 Sep

Great post... with practically zero engagement... says it all :'(

0 sats \ 12 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 27 Sep

Thanks. It was down for me too, so I was replying to everyone based on my memory of the note.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @crenshaw 27 Sep

Yeah I can't even see the embed 🤦‍♂️

0 sats \ 10 replies \ @Scoresby 27 Sep

Here's a link to the note on Primal

(Just missed my edit window)

100 sats \ 9 replies \ @Scoresby 27 Sep

Oh huh, that doesn't load in SN for me. The link https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqs083hwcxwx6jtrlh8fxt5rz7ua47tm8m4nems95mql2n8xnsajntqvkuvwr does load in my browser...

171 sats \ 7 replies \ @ek 27 Sep

We use njump to embed any nostr content

Njump is the only site I’m aware of that supports nostr embeds

We should fallback to the raw link if it fails to load

/cc @sox since you’re currently working on that part of the code base

142 sats \ 0 replies \ @sox 27 Sep

on it! 🫡

209 sats \ 5 replies \ @sox 27 Sep

done

jk, I'll create an error component to use it with the other embeds too lol

144 sats \ 4 replies \ @sox 27 Sep

I swear I'm going to give it a normal message

100 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 27 Sep

Please keep the goofy messages

69 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 27 Sep

If njump is down, why do you provide a link to njump afaict?

It should show the raw, unparsed link, which might not be from njump

For example, here, stackers were posting links from Primal

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @sox 27 Sep

why not? if we don't provide a link, then the user might assume that it's our fault.

like for example, what if the provider is twitter and the error is related to them changing APIs for no reason 20 times a week?

view all 1 replies

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 27 Sep

Yeah, that's where mine was from