pull down to refresh

150 sats \ 2 replies \ @tomlaies 27 Sep \ on: i read the luke dashjr hit piece - @udiWertheimer bitcoin
and provides a "zero knowledge proof" that proves to knots nodes that those "spam" transactions are valid, without having to download them. this is the magic of zk proofs and we don't need to get into how it works.
I know how zk proofs work. I know what spam is. This, however, I find puzzeling. Isn't it subjective what spam is? How would you even automate the detection, let alone proof it?
write
preview
103 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 27 Sep
Dumb conceptual implementation:
  1. Enhance STANDARD_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS to detect more patterns - per Luke's 2023 proposal
  2. Run your prover over the process to discern the flags
  3. Provide the flags and proof in a blockfilters-like structure
  4. Serve headers and flag structures, and let operators decide what they download
  5. Peers with similar flag-filters could exchange data between them
But the problem is that ultimately you will need people outside your totalitarian moralistic bubble to serve you these proofs, and that's why it's a bad idea to propose this after you've just made enemies of everyone outside said bubble.
It would've in my dumb opinion have been better for those that do not want to serve nor possess any content that goes against their moral compass to just run an SPV node...
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @MaaliMKen 28 Sep
Does this flagging process use ChatGPT or other AI system, by any chance?
reply