pull down to refresh

This is a good question. I'm pretty sure that zapping old posts won't get them back on the front page.
The best way to do it would be to repost the link or item, maybe with a little added commentary of your own. If you put a link to the original post at the top, I'm sure people wouldn't mind. If you really wanted to be nice you could forward sats to the original author.
Zapping old posts will affect where they show up if you go to https://stacker.news/top/posts/day (change the for drop down to whatever time frame you like). So there may be some benefit to it there.
If you go through the trouble of finding an old post, I'd be interested to see it -- so my vote is repost it.
How do I forward sats?
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 1h
When writing a post, click the options button at the bottom
reply
thank you
reply
I think @k00b's at least mulling over how to let old posts resurface to the front page.
I'd rank improving this very highly, in terms of what will make SN a more valuable resource for both readers and writers.
reply
95 sats \ 7 replies \ @k00b 16h
We’re going to remove trust in ranking for November. That’d be a good time to do this if I don’t forget
reply
As an experiment?
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 16h
Yep!
reply
Exciting
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Fenix 3h
What does this means?
reply
42 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 3h
Currently posts/comments are ranked by trust and sats. We are interested in seeing what a system without trust looks like. Meaning, everything will be ranked by sats instead.
reply
42 sats \ 1 reply \ @Fenix 3h
Are WoT here since the beginning? I think it could be better let only sats determine what is good and legit. In this new way is downzaps still a thing?
reply
63 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 3h
Downzaps will still be a thing. I haven't figured out how that'll work yet. Maybe something like outlawed = max(sats_invested * 0.1, 1000) otherwise downzaps just downrank an item proportionally
reply
Second reposting with a link, followed by your comment. Best way to get new discussion going.
You probably want to quote some of the original post, though. You shouldn't expect most people to actually click the link and read the original post.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby 16h
Yes! I should have made this more clear. By "repost" I mean completely copy the old post, possibly using > to make it indent for quote text. Also putting a link, also adding your commentary.
reply