reply on: Is there a way bring attention to older posts? \ stacker news ~meta

pull down to refresh

149 sats \ 8 replies \ @Undisciplined 2 Oct \ parent \ on: Is there a way bring attention to older posts? meta

I think @k00b's at least mulling over how to let old posts resurface to the front page.

I'd rank improving this very highly, in terms of what will make SN a more valuable resource for both readers and writers.

95 sats \ 7 replies \ @k00b 2 Oct

We’re going to remove trust in ranking for November. That’d be a good time to do this if I don’t forget

153 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 2 Oct

As an experiment?

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 2 Oct

Yep!

43 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 2 Oct

Exciting

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Fenix 2 Oct

What does this means?

42 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 2 Oct

Currently posts/comments are ranked by trust and sats. We are interested in seeing what a system without trust looks like. Meaning, everything will be ranked by sats instead.

42 sats \ 1 reply \ @Fenix 2 Oct

Are WoT here since the beginning? I think it could be better let only sats determine what is good and legit. In this new way is downzaps still a thing?

63 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 2 Oct

Downzaps will still be a thing. I haven't figured out how that'll work yet. Maybe something like outlawed = max(sats_invested * 0.1, 1000) otherwise downzaps just downrank an item proportionally