pull down to refresh

55 sats \ 9 replies \ @magnolia_mayhem 5 Oct \ on: AI devs close to scraping bottom of data barrel AI
Back in the 90s, I watched a documentary where the narrator mentioned that any future AI would need to have a robot body to experience the world and learn.
In 2016, I read articles about training ANNs and thought "No, looks like we've got enough data digitized to not need robot bodies."
Today, I decided they need robot bodies again.
write
preview
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @BeeRye 6 Oct
do you happen to remember the documentary ?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @magnolia_mayhem 6 Oct
No, but I'll dig over the next couple days an report back if I find it.
reply
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 5 Oct
Didn't you mean AGI instead of AI?
reply
135 sats \ 5 replies \ @optimism 5 Oct
Back in the 90s, there wasn't some weak form of autocomplete++ envisioned that wasn't AGI. There was just AGI; i.e. what we don't have.
I also loved the Terminator sequels.
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 6 Oct
All the sequels? I've only watched T2. I was worried further sequels wouldn't live up to first two.
reply
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 6 Oct
In the 90s I think there only was T2. But a decade later I did enjoy T3. After that I stopped.
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 5 Oct
I am on my way to where I am not.
António Variações - Estou Além (Videoclipe Oficial 1982)
translation: https://lusobritish.blog/2024/02/27/estou-alem/
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 5 Oct
Just to play devils advocate, how do you know we humans aren't just autocomplete bots?
I've certainly met some humans who behave as if they're on autocomplete
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 6 Oct
If you take one aspect of any complex system and you simulate it, is it the same? I don't think so. If you take a second aspect, and simulate that too, is it the same then?
I'd say no.
reply