pull down to refresh

Back in the 90s, I watched a documentary where the narrator mentioned that any future AI would need to have a robot body to experience the world and learn.
In 2016, I read articles about training ANNs and thought "No, looks like we've got enough data digitized to not need robot bodies."
Today, I decided they need robot bodies again.
Didn't you mean AGI instead of AI?
reply
135 sats \ 5 replies \ @optimism 14h
Back in the 90s, there wasn't some weak form of autocomplete++ envisioned that wasn't AGI. There was just AGI; i.e. what we don't have.
I also loved the Terminator sequels.
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 14h
All the sequels? I've only watched T2. I was worried further sequels wouldn't live up to first two.
reply
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 6h
In the 90s I think there only was T2. But a decade later I did enjoy T3. After that I stopped.
reply
I am on my way to where I am not.
António Variações - Estou Além (Videoclipe Oficial 1982)
reply
Just to play devils advocate, how do you know we humans aren't just autocomplete bots?
I've certainly met some humans who behave as if they're on autocomplete
reply
If you take one aspect of any complex system and you simulate it, is it the same? I don't think so. If you take a second aspect, and simulate that too, is it the same then?
I'd say no.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @BeeRye 12h
do you happen to remember the documentary ?
reply
No, but I'll dig over the next couple days an report back if I find it.
reply