pull down to refresh

Your question is not worthy of response because it seeks to obstruct the consideration wider issues I have raised...issues you are desparate to ignore and avoid...but that are relevant and in context to the post you made.
I don't care about your desire to avoid the wider issues...it just sadly demonstrates your inability to engage in good faith debate and so is a waste of time to respond with compliance to such narrative bullying demands and avoidance.
Did anyone teach you how to engage in sequential good faith reasoned debate? If you make a post and people respond with a widening and exploration of the topic then at least respond in kind rather than seeking to make personal attacks and ridicule the respondent- it just makes you look dogmatic and incapable of a reasoned contest and exploration of ideas.
My question was based on your assertion regarding west. So now you admit you cannot answer it, and continue with your propaganda. And no, I have no intention to engage with another wumao scum, especially one that cannot answer a basic question.
Thanks a lot, I got my answer anyway.
reply
I have answered it but you cannot apparently cope with the complexity of the answer. It perhaps somewhat challenges some of your preconceptions and assumptions.
That is though a valid outcome for a contest of ideas. To attempt to explore, widen and deepen the understanding of any topic.
For me all the above are valid reasons and context for discussions about Bitcoin- it's not about how much Bitcoin you or I may hold, but about how Bitcoin provides an alternative to the fiat debt based monetary-banking system that exists to subjugate, exploit, oppress and enslave most of humanity.
reply