pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @sudonaka 17h \ parent \ on: Consensus rules are enough for Bitcoin to succeed or Bitcoin fails bitcoin
Yup now I’m a statist because I don’t want data-storage legal theory applied to Bitcoin by a totally unnecessary and highly contentious default change that is being forced on the network in the face of mass protest. Right.
write
preview
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Scoresby OP 17h
forced on the network
Run knots? How is it forced on the network if you can choose to run something else?
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @sudonaka 15h
Changing the default setting in the face of massive backlash and user exodus is what I mean by forced.
You are arguing semantics now.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Scoresby OP 4h
either this is a permissionless system where anyone can run any software they want or not.
clearly, every single person who has an issue with Core v30 could run Core v29 or could run Knots.
If there is widespread support, they surely could find some developers who will be willing to put time into writing software that does what they would like it to do. If they can't find any willing developers, perhaps there are people who are willing to donate funds to hire developers to do this. If it is truly a widespread desire of node runners, then support for the kind of software they would like to run should be here.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @sudonaka 39m
If there is widespread support, they surely could find some developers
The “widespread support” is for NOT RUINING THE MEMPOOL.
All we need “the devs” to do is nothing!
You are actually being a complete midwit
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby OP 23m
The users can "do nothing" by not upgrading. Why is this not sufficient?
reply