pull down to refresh
30 sats \ 4 replies \ @siggy47 OP 3h \ parent \ on: Books & Articles Weekly, Issue 85 BooksAndArticles
Oh, I'm sorry. I see what you mean. Those are all the ones I noticed. Some may slip through the cracks. I hate to have you doing updates all the time. We nned editable posts! One more thing. I'm not a strict Territorian. I think SN will have cross posting some day. I know that ~the_stacker_muse has book reviews too that you can include. @jbschirtzinger is posting a lot there.
Yeah, he has pinged me on a few of his reviews to include in the directory, which I'm happy to oblige.
My intention isn't to limit my directory to ~BooksAndArticles. But on the practical side, I need to source the reviews from other compiled lists, since I don't have the capacity to iterate through every SN item to see if it's a review or not.
These updates are handy though, I can use them to update the list, even if it's not the complete set.
reply
I think periodically stackers like @cryotosensei and @jbschirtzinger should collect all their reviews in a link post. They would earn some extra sats, I would permanently include it in the weekly, and it would be easy for you to search.
reply
The slated changes to the editor might make this quite feasible for me.
reply
There's great value in these directories, no doubt.
I'll not likely do much compiling for ~the_stacker_muse, since I think my energy is better spent (though I don't reckon I've done a very good job of it yet) trying to cultivate the creative side of literature community here.
I wouldnt say I am anti-categorization, but definitely averse to it sometimes.
...I like it where people self-categorize their works especially where it comes to artistic input, but others here have disagreed with me on that, and I see the reasons why -- I did maintain that it is important to acknowledge form if you want to be taken seriously (I.e. people don't just splatter paint on a canvas and get applauded for being the next Jackson Pollock.)
reply