It's a bit tricky to break down sat vs CC zaps, but I think it's doable.  I haven't done the work to tease them out yet, though.


SimpleStacker

whether the moneyness of the zaps really matters. That is, does it matter that zaps are real money? Or would users be responsive to these micro-incentives even if they were just points on a scoreboard?  (i.e. Reddit reputation, etc.)  It's plausible that they moneyness doesn't matter, and that people treat SN as a game to earn points.  But it's also plausible (and more likely) that the moneyness does matter.  This may be hard to test

is any of the data about CCs vs Sats publicly readable?

econ

Research in Public #04: Post fee influences post quality

> whether the moneyness of the zaps really matters. That is, does it matter that zaps are real money? Or would users be responsive to these micro-incentives even if they were just points on a scoreboard?  (i.e. Reddit reputation, etc.)  It's plausible that they moneyness doesn't matter, and that people treat SN as a game to earn points.  But it's also plausible (and more likely) that the moneyness does matter.  This may be hard to test

is any of the data about CCs vs Sats publicly readable?