I had to think a bit how I felt about this one after I went through it, and I'm settling on: I align with what he says here, but maybe it would have been a better use of time to explain the Human Advantage to AI in more depth than the endless tweeter sphere argument with Matt Walsh narration. Perhaps that is because I have zero interest in Walsh or the bird app hyperbole.
I mean, I guess so. I didn't see the Twitter exchange nor did I got read it. Don't think you have to care about Walsh. Not really about him as much as the argument. It's one I hear from others as well.
Human Advantageto AI in more depth than the endless tweeter sphere argument with Matt Walsh narration. Perhaps that is because I have zero interest in Walsh or the bird app hyperbole.