pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 11h \ parent \ on: Stacker Saloon
i guess it depends on the definition, but i tend to think of ACINQ like it's a sidechain. an individual channel has chronological state, but i suppose it's not really "chaining" transaction history into blocks, nor maintaining chronological state across all channels in an interdependent way.
still, i like the metaphor and thinking about many well-defined psbts as a sidechain-like layering mechanism.
then each UTXO is also a sidechain :)
reply