> What part creates a schism?

wanting to disrupt both traditional banking systems and the global fiat currencies underpinning them with a system that can't scale to compete with them on a global level

> Otherwise, it's globally adopted at the cost of disruptive impact

you want disruption, but not global adoption, that makes no sense to me

What part creates a schism? The entire point of Bitcoin as it was originally created was to disrupt both traditional banking systems and the global fiat currencies underpinning them; I'm sure the OG cypherpunks (who are all using Monero or Pirate now, or something even more niche and/or private) and Satoshi themselves would be pissed seeing JPMorgan Chase and firms like Blackrock gush all over it now that it poses no systematic threat.