This Day on SN: October 29 \ stacker news ~meta

#745507 on AMA with niftynei, core-lightning contributor, btc++ organizer, base58er
- 270 sats \ 0 replies \ @niftynei \ October 29, 2024
  
  This is extremely hard. I think Rusty Russell is the wisest person I know, based on how i’ve seen him manage open source communities and the lightning spec process. absolutely the goat at interfaces and apis too. [...]
#297574 on Do you think that the future of the Lightning Network is in jeopardy?
- 3748 sats \ 0 replies \ @Murch \ October 29, 2023
  
  IMHO, this has been blown out of proportion. The attack exists, but it is fairly expensive and difficult to pull off. There are some simple things implementations do now like actively rebroadcasting the HTLC_timeout transaction, watching the mempool, and limiting their exposure by restricting the amount and count of HTLCs in flight which make it even harder and more expensive. [...]
#87075 on In 100 years, the block subsidy will be ~30 sats...
- 412 sats \ 3 replies \ @Scroogey \ October 29, 2022
  
  The coinbase output includes all the fees paid by the transactions included in the block. If the sum of reward and fees is still below the dust limit, there is no monetary incentive to mine... [...]
#4263 on SN release: thread enhancements, lnurl-withdrawal, dupe detection, and more
- 32 sats \ 2 replies \ @g4ala \ October 29, 2021
  
  RE: OP prominence. [...]

~AMA
- 26.6k stacked \ 0 revenue \ 42.6k spent \ 2 posts \ 87 comments \ October 29, 2024
~bitcoin
- 62.2k stacked \ 0 revenue \ 295.3k spent \ 121 posts \ 354 comments \ October 29, 2023
~bitcoin
- 114.7k stacked \ 0 revenue \ 125k spent \ 63 posts \ 155 comments \ October 29, 2022
~bitcoin
- 371 stacked \ 0 revenue \ 406 spent \ 24 posts \ 16 comments \ October 29, 2021