I don't think it's a matter of belief. Bitcoin fulfils these criteria therefore it's objectively valuable, inevitable.

Using this framework in any other context is extremely difficult because outside bitcoin the world is full of noise and obscurity and opacity. I don't think I'm saying anything novel, people use this framework in all of their value judgments innately, it's just complex. 

But bitcoin is certain because it's pristine.

fourrules

econ

What bitcoin taught me: Value is not subjective

Indeed. How you measure value? How do you know your value is the objective one? 

The bigger question is this framework useful? To say something has an objective value is one thing. Easier case to make. Value is not obvious sometimes.

I believe bitcoin has objective value but that doesn't help others. Just me. 