pull down to refresh

100 sats \ 5 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 17h \ parent \ on: Research in Public #07: The incentive structures on Stacker News (WIP) econ
I just think hooks for lawyers should stay away and believe that SN is noncustodial for other reason
That's just pure B.S., They likely had that change planned anyway; the legal issue just pushed them to do it sooner. But for real, only @k00b knows the answer.
write
preview
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @supratic 17h
So from your perspective, this bs is worth to be mentioned in a research paper. gosh... where are we going? I'll just note down we agree on disagreeing over this matter, at least I know and if ever need to be again, I'll avoid brig it up with you.
reply
100 sats \ 3 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 17h
My point is that the truth should never be hidden; the consequences are always worse.
reply
33 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 10h
Fwiw, I agree with you and I have muted @supratic a long time ago
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @supratic 17h
Are you worried? Consequences of what? Why am I arguing with you again?
What's truth for you could be a lie for someone else, keep that in mind. Interpretation of fact change depending on the perspective such are observed from.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 17h
That applies across the board. In this case, the only thing that's gonna happen is a bad look.
reply