pull down to refresh
20 sats \ 4 replies \ @Coinsreporter OP 4 Nov \ parent \ on: CricZap’s Ultimate Champion Crowned! 🎉 Year-End Results & Rewards Stacker_Sports
Who considers?
A post irrespective of the territory shouldn't be buried if zapped by multiple users, similarly a post should not be ahead from it if only zapped by a single user and only zapped in very low amounts.
Probably the trust system weighs too much on trust and not enough on zaps. The contribution of a zap to an item's trust-weighted-score is:
trust * log10(zap). This means that someone with half the trust will have to zap 10 times more to get the same effect as someone with double their trust.There's also a heavy time decay as well. So your older post is going to be downweighted relative to newer posts.
reply
Actually my math might be wrong with the double/times 10 statement.
But the point is still the same. A proportionate increase in trust has a bigger effect than a proportionate increase in zap amount.
reply