Officials acknowledged they don’t know the identities of the people they’re killing and can’t meet the evidentiary burden to prosecute survivors.
Archive: https://archive.is/n6LfR
pull down to refresh
pull down to refresh
Officials acknowledged they don’t know the identities of the people they’re killing and can’t meet the evidentiary burden to prosecute survivors.
Archive: https://archive.is/n6LfR
That's the norm for war, right?
If people are figuring out that's a problem, I'm not complaining.
It's okay when Obama does it
2 wrongs make a "who cares?"
Did I say that?
no but some people do imply that
What isn't?
moron
you're the braindead zombie
There is no evidentiary burden to meet or fulfill
How so? They're accused of criminal activity. That's supposed to be followed by presentation of evidence.
It’s a military strike against enemy combatants
Uh huh...I feel like I missed the Congressional declaration of war against a particular enemy.
Why in the world would you take their word for something like that? All they do is lie about this stuff.
How do you know they were enemy combatants without any evidence to support that?
In what sense are they enemy combatants if they're not attacking America?
Consider the source, the intercept which is no longer credible post Glenn Greenwald
I don't disagree with you there, but the alternative is giving the US government the benefit of the doubt.
What experience from this century suggests they deserve that?
mRNA?
anyway, the article mentions Venezuela zero times but Venezuela is in the URL
Hay un refrán que dice " no tires piedras al techo ajeno si el tuyo es de cristal" , que ha hecho el con la delincuencia y el tráfico de drogas prostitución infantil en su país. O es como los comunistas que ocultan bajo el telón sus errores culpando a otros?