pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 8 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 3h \ parent \ on: Econ October Recap econ
#1261402 - It is at the TOP of the list.
The Libertarian circle jerk cannot refute it.
They say they are open to the most fundamental free market of all - the contest of ideas - but they lie.
When issues are raised that they cannot refute they go into cowering denial and obstruct the free market in ideas like a bunch of quasi fascist hypocrits.
The contest of ideas is not a popularity contest or echo chamber - it is a question of reasoned debate - and you dare not even engage.
Because your Libertarian ideology is such indefensible trash.
I only debate with reasonable people.
Cheers,
reply
What is unreasonable about this proposition?
'China has the USA/West over a barrel.
Without rare earths supply the US military industrial combine is broke.
The US cannot fight a war with China or anyone without rare earths.
Trump started a trade war with China but China had prepared by investing in dominating global rare earths supply chains and now Trump must Beg for continued access to rare earths supply chains.
Libertarian nonsense that free markets always deliver better results than government involvement and investment in strategic markets has been demonstrably proven complete and utter bullshit.'
Not one of you can refute it.
You only call it unreasonable because you cannot present a credible reasoned refutation to it.
reply
Libertarian nonsense that free markets always deliver better results than government involvement and investment in strategic markets has been demonstrably proven complete and utter bullshit.
Scoreboard. Strategy owns more BTC than the US and PRC combined.
reply
Do you understand the word always?
I agree that often, in fact mostly, free markets tend to deliver the best result, but with the proviso that in some significant cases (eg rare earths) they do not.
I need only provide one example of free markets failing to provide the ideal outcome to disprove the proposition that they are always superior, and I have. Rare Earths.
Strategies concentration of Bitcoin custody into a form where it is hoarded as a speculative commodity and is prone to US government regulatory capture/confiscation is a debateable example of free markets delivering the best outcome.
Much of Strategies 'success' to date is due to tax and regulatory factors which Strategy takes advantage of.
reply
挖個礦有什麼關系？you think no one can mine minerals unless some government employee is giving orders and extorting the people doing the actual work??
reply
It is not the mining of rare earths that is the difficulty.
It is the refining of them.
China has invested heavily in the refining of rare earths for several decades and now controls the supply of rare earths globally.
It will take the US/West at least a decade to build refining capacity to even start to regain supply chains independent of China and even then only at a massive cost which no private refiner will fund- it will only happen with Massive US government SUBSIDIES.
reply
reply
The contest of ideas is not a popularity contest or echo chamber - it is a question of reasoned debate - you hide behind childish memes because you dare not engage in reasoned debate of the issues I raise because your Libertarian dogma is indefensible nonsense.
If it wasn't you could easily demolish my arguments. But you cannot.
reply