Yes.

In his interview with Jordan Peterson, I remember Saylor saying something like "Bitcoin is first of all a human protocol, then it is a computer protocol". In other words, assume the states co-opted what we call Bitcoin and captured all major mining pools. Maybe not physically but in principle e.g. You have to comply to xyz which undermines permissionlessness and leaves only a vague form of it. At the moment, if the consensus is reached (maybe after some years of other weird stuff happening), most Bitcoiners will stop seeing what we call Bitcoin to be Bitcoin. They will start Bitcoin by spinning off a fork and I'll make sure to go to that. Maybe it will have properties of ZEC, maybe Monero properties, I'll not say "but these came from ZEC". Nope. I'll pack it up. If they stay for a while longer, then it means the movement is fighting oppression from within a while longer. Maybe it will raid some sidechain and evolve further from there. Whatever. But Bitcoin cannot die unless one hunts and kills all Bitcoiners and wipes all nodes of the Genesis block, wipe all altcoins (which I do not consider anti-Bitcoin in the strictest sense but side projects coz people have to eat. If i had Hoskinson's skills I too would spin up some fancy chains). Bitcoin, the King, will stay on his hill. And when the moment comes, I kid you not, Eth, Solana, they'll all defend it. Not to mention Presidents around the world. Who can really attack Bitcoin to 100% destroy it and get away with it? Nobody.